The suit alleges that Intel (INTC, Fortune 500), the largest maker of computer microprocessors, violated state and federal law “by engaging in a worldwide, systematic campaign of illegal conduct … in order to maintain its monopoly power and prices.”
It also charges that Intel’s “illegal actions” involved three of the pearl jewelry largest U.S. computer makers: Dell (DELL, Fortune 500), Hewlett-Packard (HPQ, Fortune 500) and IBM (IBM, Fortune 500).
The statement from Cuomo’s office alleged that Intel paid billions of dollars to large computer makers who agreed to use Intel’s microprocessors exclusively. Sometimes, these so-called “rebates” added up to more than a company’s reported quarterly net income, the statement said.
In response to these charges, Intel spokesman Chuck Mulloy said, “We disagree with the New York Attorney General. Neither consumers who have consistently benefited from lower prices and increased innovation nor justice are being served by filing this case now. Intel will defend itself.”
Microprocessors are the “brains” of most personal computers and are generally sold to manufacturers rather than directly to consumers.
Cuomo also said Intel threatened and punished those “perceived to biwa pearl be working too closely with [its] competitors,” doing so by directly funding a computer maker’s competitors and ending joint venture projects.
“Rather than compete fairly, Intel used bribery and coercion to maintain a stranglehold on the market,” Cuomo said in the statement.
The investigation began in January 2008, and the attorney general’s office said it “reviewed millions of pages of documents” before filing the lawsuit in federal court Wednesday.
The suit “seeks to bar further anticompetitive acts by Intel, restore lost competition, recover monetary damages suffered by New York … and collect penalties,” the akoya pearl statement said.