|
Lethal Weapon 3 (1992)
IMDB rating: 6.40
Plot: Martin Riggs finally meets his match in the form of Lorna Cole, a beautiful but tough policewoman. Together with Roger Murtaugh, his partner, the three attempt to expose a crooked former policeman and his huge arms racket. The crooked cop (Jack Travis) thwarts them at every turn, mainly by killing anyone who is about to talk, but Murtaugh has personal problems of his own as his family are brought into the equation.
|
i find Lethal Weapon 3 DivX version and download
Directors: Donner Richard
Actors: Gibson Mel,Glover Danny,Pesci Joe,Wilson Stuart,Kahan Steve,Hines Damon,Millar Gregory,Chinlund Nick,Iorg Jason,Scarfe Alan,Action,Comedy,Crime,Thriller,
Since the Liberals now claim there were no WMD in Iraq, should Clinton be charged for falisifying information?
he gave Bush?
"One way or the other, we are determined to deny Iraq the capacity to develop weapons of mass destruction and the missiles to deliver them. That is our bottom line."
President Clinton, Feb. 4, 1998.
"Together we must also confront the new hazards of chemical and biological weapons, and the outlaw states, terrorists and organized criminals seeking to acquire them. Saddam Hussein has spent the better part of this decade, and much of his nation’s wealth, not on providing for the Iraqi people, but on developing nuclear, chemical and biological weapons and the missiles to deliver them."
President Clinton, Jan. 27, 1998.
"Fateful decisions will be made in the days and weeks ahead. At issue is nothing less than the fundamental question of whether or not we can keep the most lethal weapons known to mankind out of the hands of an unreconstructed tyrant and aggressor who is in the same league as the most brutal dictators of this century."
Sen. Joe Biden (D, DE), Feb. 12, 1998
"It is essential that a dictator like Saddam not be allowed to evade international strictures and wield frightening weapons of mass destruction. As long as UNSCOM is prevented from carrying out its mission, the effort to monitor Iraqi compliance with Resolution 687 becomes a dangerous shell game. Neither the United States nor the global community can afford to allow Saddam Hussein to continue on this path."
Sen. Tom Daschle (D, SD), Feb. 12, 1998
"Iraq is a long way from [here], but what happens there matters a great deal here. For the risks that the leaders of a rogue state will use nuclear, chemical or biological weapons against us or our allies is the greatest security threat we face."
Madeleine Albright, Feb. 18, 1998.
"He will use those weapons of mass destruction again, as he has ten times since 1983."
Sandy Berger, Clinton National Security Adviser, Feb. 18, 1998.
"We urge you, after consulting with Congress, and consistent with the U.S. Constitution and laws, to take necessary actions (including, if appropriate, air and missile strikes on suspect Iraqi sites) to respond effectively to the threat posed by Iraq’s refusal to end its weapons of mass destruction programs."
Letter to President Clinton, signed by Sens. Carl Levin, Tom Daschle, John Kerry, and others Oct. 9, 1998.
"As a member of the House Intelligence Committee, I am keenly aware that the proliferation of chemical and biological weapons is an issue of grave importance to all nations. Saddam Hussein has been engaged in the development of weapons of mass destruction technology which is a threat to countries in the region and he has made a mockery of the weapons inspection process."
Rep. Nancy Pelosi (D, CA), Dec. 16, 1998.
"Hussein has … chosen to spend his money on building weapons of mass destruction and palaces for his cronies."
Madeleine Albright, Clinton Secretary of State, Nov. 10, 1999.
"This December will mark three years since United Nations inspectors last visited Iraq. There is no doubt that since that time, Saddam Hussein has reinvigorated his weapons programs. Reports indicate that biological, chemical and nuclear programs continue apace and may be back to pre-Gulf War status. In addition, Saddam continues to refine delivery systems and is doubtless using the cover of a licit missile program to develop longer-range missiles that will threaten the United States and our allies."
Letter to President Bush, Signed by Sen. Bob Graham (D, FL) and others, Dec, 5, 2001.
"We begin with the common belief that Saddam Hussein is a tyrant and a threat to the peace and stability of the region. He has ignored the mandate of the United Nations and is building weapons of mass destruction and the means of delivering them."
Sen. Carl Levin (D, MI), Sept. 19, 2002.
"We know that he has stored away secret supplies of biological and chemical weapons throughout his country."
Al Gore, Sept. 23, 2002.
"Iraq’s search for weapons of mass destruction has proven impossible to deter and we should assume that it will continue for as long as Saddam is in power."
Al Gore, Sept. 23, 2002.
"We have known for many years that Saddam Hussein is seeking and developing weapons of mass destruction."
Sen. Ted Kennedy (D, MA), Sept. 27, 2002.
"The last UN weapons inspectors left Iraq in October 1998. We are confident that Saddam Hussein retains some stockpiles of chemical and biological weapons, and that he has since embarked on a crash course to build up his chemical and biological warfare capabilities. Intelligence reports indicate that he is seeking nuclear weapons…"
Sen. Robert Byrd (D, WV), Oct. 3, 2002.
"My position is very clear: The time has come for decisive action to eliminate the threat posed by Saddam Hussein’s weapons of mas
A couple of years ago I asked a question as to why people are saying Bush was lying about WMDs when Clinton himself brought it up. Here is that video that supports that question.
Maverick Zero | Nov 23, 2009
Errors in intelligence and errors of judgment are the hallmarks of government.
prusa1237 | Nov 23, 2009
your argument is slanted and incorrect.
Kami | Nov 23, 2009
The Bush administration knew truth:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jHnSPsZsh yM
But they decided to invade anyway.
FYI: We found no WMD’s in Iraq.
David H | Nov 23, 2009
Every time I bring up Bush, I get shouted down: "That’s in the past. You can’t blame Bush anymore."
But you, my friend, are REALLY mired in the past.
Sadcat | Nov 23, 2009
I don’t recall CLinton showing satelitte images of "mobile labs" and discussing "mushroom clouds". Nor do I recall him sending in 160,000 troops and suffering 44,000 killed and injured…
whimsy | Nov 23, 2009
Clinton was getting his information from Joe Lieberman and John McCain.
You fail.
Suspended_23 | Nov 23, 2009
Good Stuff!
Unhappy New Year ): | Nov 23, 2009
An oldie, but a goodie.
When you have evidence of Clinton proposing going to war over these unsubstantiated weapons, then get back to me. Until then, your boy, Bush, is the one with the baggage.
Crown Royal | Nov 23, 2009
No. Credit the intelligence community with providing false and inaccurate information to Clinton and then to Bush. Fault Bush for not waiting until the UN inspector had finished his job. Fault Bush for invading Iraq precipitously. Fault Bush for getting more than 4,500 of our young people killed needlessly.
Deke666 | Nov 23, 2009
Clinton didn’t invade a country unrelated to 9/11. He did not act rashly, he did not blow billions a month on a pointless war, and he did not turn our surplus into a 400 billion dollar deficit.
Obviously, Clinton was capable of reviewing information and analyzing it properly before doing something stupid. If only Bush Republicans had tried the same tactic.
Sunshine | Nov 23, 2009
I hear there is something suspicious going on at Teapot Dome too. Better call FOX
brown9500.v10 | Nov 23, 2009
President Clinton did not start a war with Iraq. Shrubya’s legacy is one of idiocy.
Hector Frodo | Nov 23, 2009
well, you have to give credit to Billy Bob
At least Clinton bombed after inspectors were kicked out, Bush on the other hand bombed after inspectors were let back in.
Freedom | Nov 23, 2009
President Clinton did not start a war …
No he was to busy playing dogy in the WH. and not doing the job he was elected to do. I guess he though it was his play house.
MyWayrNot | Nov 23, 2009
Among a plethora of other things.
Nikki | Nov 23, 2009
But you should be happy with your body 
