Mr King told the Treasury Select Committee this year that Britain could not afford another fiscal stimulus package, just as Mr Brown was preparing to fly to Chile for a meeting with G20 ministers to discuss a co-ordinated, global fiscal-stimulus package. Mr King also contradicted comments made in the Chancellor’s Mansion House speech, in front of Mr Darling. In the past, such a difference in policy views would normally have been conducted in private.
In the event that the Conservatives win the freshwater pearl general election next year, Mr King would assume a much more powerful role as Governor of the central bank. Under Tory plans, the task of regulating the City would be taken from the Financial Services Authority and instead given to the Bank of England.
Yesterday, George Osborne, the Shadow Chancellor, said: “It is deeply worrying and extraordinary that at this crucial time there is a dispute at the very heart of economic policy between the Governor of the Bank of England, the Chancellor and the Prime Minister.”
He added: “Mervyn King made a freshwater pearl jewelry powerful argument, which many people in the country would have appreciated, about the lack of reform after the biggest banking crisis this country has faced. It is clear this Government is now a roadblock to the banking reform we need after this crisis.”
The Financial Services Authority (FSA) will publish a paper today on whether banks are too big to fail.
Lord Turner of Ecchinswell, the FSA’s chairman, has already criticised the idea of splitting banks, saying that modern finance is too interlinked to sever less risky retail banking from “casino” investment banking.
The FSA is likely to say that pearl jewelry wholesale there is merit in the idea that banks create “living wills”, so that they could be wound down relatively easily if they failed.